![]() ![]() Quadro: Quadro RTX 8000, Quadro RTX 6000, Quadro RTX 5000, Quadro RTX 4000, Quadro RTX 3000, Quadro T2000, Quadro T1000.GeForce GTX: GeForce GTX 1660 Ti, GeForce GTX 1660, GeForce GTX 1650, GeForce MX250, GeForce MX230.GeForce RTX: GeForce RTX 2080 Ti, GeForce RTX 2080, GeForce RTX 2070, GeForce RTX 2060. #GEFORCE GTX 860M GPU FULL#NVIDIA provides full OpenGL 4.6 support and functionality on NVIDIA GeForce and Quadro graphics card with one of the following Turing, Volta, Pascal, Maxwell (first or second generation) or Kepler based GPUs: #GEFORCE GTX 860M GPU DRIVER#Windows driver version 426.02 and Linux driver version 418.52.18 provide new features for OpenGL developers to test their upcoming OpenGL applications. #GEFORCE GTX 860M GPU DRIVERS#OpenGL 4.6 support is available for Windows and Linux in our general release drivers available here: Windows You get some GeForce GTX 660M and GTX 770M results for comparison too.This page provides links to both general release drivers that support OpenGL 4.6, and developer beta drivers that support upcoming OpenGL features. See below for all the benchmark results, as revealed by the folks at NotebookReview. And in all honesty, it's not all that necessary. So while, physically, the chip has all the same endowments as the GM107 featured in the desktop GeForce GTX 750 Ti video adapter, it can't run at the same performance level. The graphics processing unit seems to run at 540 MHz, which might seem like little before you remember that this is a mobile GPU so it's supposed to be slower, because it needs to make do with a lower TDP (thermal design power). Fortunately, a GPU-Z screenshot was included, which reveals the 640 CUDA cores, 40 TMUs (texture mapping units), 16 ROPs (raster operating units), 3 GB of GDDR5 VRAM (5 GHz clock), and a memory interface of 192 bits. Fortunately, not by much.Īs for the specifications of the GTX 860M, they aren't revealed by the benchmark. The Extreme profile preset showed a score lower than for the GeForce GTX 770M though. That puts the 860M somewhere between the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti Boost and the AMD Radeon R7 260X. The test results in 3DMark 11 show that the score was of 5,339 points, which is a performance level above that of the GeForce GTX 770M. ![]() The new benchmark suggests that it will happen sooner rather than later though, and this will give people something to look forward to, if nothing else. So maybe new notebooks featuring the chips, 860M or some other, will appear in a week, maybe it will take two, or three, maybe two months. It's not really clear when the Maxwell-based mobile GeForce 800M series will come out. For Tegra K1 it was AnTuTu, for Maxwell GeForce GTX 860M is was the 3DMark 11 suite. Just a short time ago, the 64-Bit Dual-Core NVIDIA Tegra K1 Project Denver was benchmarked, and now the GeForce GTX 860M has followed suit.Īlthough the benchmarks used in each case are different. Or perhaps we should say that some of its products are thus. NVIDIA seems particularly prone towards premature benchmarks this week. Soon, though, the GeForce 800M series of mobile GPUs will be updated, and one of the chips has been benchmarked. The GeForce GTX 750 and GTX 750 Ti graphics cards are the only two products currently up for sale that are based on the NVIDIA Maxwell graphics processing unit architecture. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |